Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization

Mack, MC; Schuur, EA; Bret-Harte, MS; Shaver, GR; Chapin, FS, III

HERO ID

89312

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year

2004

Language

English

PMID

15386009

HERO ID 89312
In Press No
Year 2004
Title Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization
Authors Mack, MC; Schuur, EA; Bret-Harte, MS; Shaver, GR; Chapin, FS, III
Journal Nature
Volume 431
Issue 7007
Page Numbers 440-443
Abstract Global warming is predicted to be most pronounced at high latitudes, and observational evidence over the past 25 years suggests that this warming is already under way. One-third of the global soil carbon pool is stored in northern latitudes, so there is considerable interest in understanding how the carbon balance of northern ecosystems will respond to climate warming. Observations of controls over plant productivity in tundra and boreal ecosystems have been used to build a conceptual model of response to warming, where warmer soils and increased decomposition of plant litter increase nutrient availability, which, in turn, stimulates plant production and increases ecosystem carbon storage. Here we present the results of a long-term fertilization experiment in Alaskan tundra, in which increased nutrient availability caused a net ecosystem loss of almost 2,000 grams of carbon per square meter over 20 years. We found that annual aboveground plant production doubled during the experiment. Losses of carbon and nitrogen from deep soil layers, however, were substantial and more than offset the increased carbon and nitrogen storage in plant biomass and litter. Our study suggests that projected release of soil nutrients associated with high-latitude warming may further amplify carbon release from soils, causing a net loss of ecosystem carbon and a positive feedback to climate warming.
Doi 10.1038/nature02887
Pmid 15386009
Wosid WOS:000224000500037
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Comments ECRIB.Nature (London, U.K.) 431: 440-443.
Is Public Yes
Language Text English
Is Peer Review Yes