Voltammetric codetection of arsenic(III) and copper(II) in alkaline buffering system with gold nanostar modified electrodes
Sullivan, C; Lu, D; Brack, E; Drew, C; Kurup, P
| HERO ID | 7457004 |
|---|---|
| In Press | No |
| Year | 2020 |
| Title | Voltammetric codetection of arsenic(III) and copper(II) in alkaline buffering system with gold nanostar modified electrodes |
| Authors | Sullivan, C; Lu, D; Brack, E; Drew, C; Kurup, P |
| Journal | Analytica Chimica Acta |
| Volume | 1107 |
| Page Numbers | 63-73 |
| Abstract | One of the challenges preventing rapid, onsite voltammetric detection of arsenic(III) is the overlapping oxidation peak of copper(II). This paper describes a novel methodology for the voltammetric detection of trace levels of arsenic(III) in the presence of high copper(II) concentrations (up to the action level of 1.3 mg L-1 set by the US EPA for drinking water). Square wave stripping voltammetry tests were performed using disposable carbon screen printed electrodes modified with gold nanostars on samples buffered with Britton-Robinson buffer. The optimized parameters for accurate codetection of arsenic(III) and copper(II) were a buffer pH of 9.5, a loading of gold nanostars of 2.39*10-5 nmol per electrode, a deposition voltage of -0.8 V, and a deposition time of 180 s. Based on calibration testing, the limits of detection for arsenic(III) and copper(II) were determined to be 2.9 μg L-1 and 42.5 μg L-1, respectively. Furthermore, the linear ranges for arsenic and copper were 0-100 μg L-1 and 0-250 μg L-1 with sensitivities of 0.101 μA (μg L-1)-1 and 0.121 μA (μg L-1)-1, respectively. Interference testing was performed with several common ionic species, sodium bicarbonate, sodium chloride, tannic acid, iron(iii) chloride, magnesium chloride, calcium nitrate, and sodium sulfate, with only sodium bicarbonate significantly affecting the response. Validation testing in real-world samples was performed by comparison with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy. The validation testing demonstrated good accuracy and precision, expressed as percent recovery and relative standard deviation (RSD), respectively, in river water and tap water, with mean percent recoveries of 87.7% (RSD = 4.20%) and 83.2% (RSD = 10.02%), respectively. |
| Doi | 10.1016/j.aca.2020.02.015 |
| Pmid | 32200903 |
| Wosid | WOS:000522073300008 |
| Is Certified Translation | No |
| Dupe Override | No |
| Is Public | Yes |
| Language Text | English |