2016 billion-ton report: Advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy. Volume 2: Environmental sustainability effects of select scenarios from volume 1.
HERO ID
5013159
Reference Type
Technical Report
Year
2017
Language
English
| HERO ID | 5013159 |
|---|---|
| Year | 2017 |
| Title | 2016 billion-ton report: Advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy. Volume 2: Environmental sustainability effects of select scenarios from volume 1. |
| Authoring Organization | U.S. Department of Energy |
| Editor | Efroymson, RA; Langholtz, MH; Johnson, KE; Stokes, BJ |
| Publisher Text | Oak Ridge National Laboratory |
| City | Oak Ridge, TN |
| Abstract | With the goal of understanding environmental effects of a growing bioeconomy, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), national laboratories, and U.S. Forest Service research laboratories, together with academic and industry collaborators, undertook a study to estimate environmental effects of potential biomass production scenarios in the United States, with an emphasis on agricultural and forest biomass. Potential effects investigated include changes in soil organic carbon (SOC), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water quality and quantity, air emissions, and biodiversity. Effects of altered land-management regimes were analyzed based on select county-level biomass-production scenarios for 2017 and 2040 taken from the 2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy (BT16), volume 1, which assumes that the land bases for agricultural and forestry would not change over time. The scenarios reflect constraints on biomass supply (e.g., excluded areas; implementation of management practices; and consideration of food, feed, forage, and fiber demands and exports) that intend to address sustainability concerns. Nonetheless, both beneficial and adverse environmental effects might be expected. To characterize these potential effects, this research sought to estimate where and under what modeled scenarios or conditions positive and negative environmental effects could occur nationwide. The report also includes a discussion of land-use change (LUC) (i.e., land management change) assumptions associated with the scenario transitions (but not including analysis of indirect LUC [ILUC]), analyses of climate sensitivity of feedstock productivity under a set of potential scenarios, and a qualitative environmental effects analysis of algae production under carbon dioxide (CO2) co-location scenarios. Because BT16 biomass supplies are simulated independent of a defined end use, most analyses do not include benefits from displacing fossil fuels or other products, with the exception of including a few illustrative cases on potential reductions in GHG emissions and fossil energy consumption associated with using biomass supplies for fuel, power, heat, and chemicals. |
| Doi | 10.2172/1338837 |
| Report Number | ORNL/TM-2016/727 |
| Url | https://www.energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/downloads/2016-billion-ton-report-volume-2-environmental-sustainability-effects |
| Is Certified Translation | No |
| Dupe Override | No |
| Number Of Pages | 642 |
| Is Public | Yes |
| Language Text | English |
| Relationship(s) |